Mellisa elaborated, “Now, I’m not saying that the object is a tiny, living, breathing creature of some kind, but if you look at the enlarged images, you can see that it does resemble a two-legged creature: it has a head, eye, body, arms, legs, hands, and feet. No one knows what the foreign object is, but it must be something because it reflects light and casts a shadow on the ground. It doesn’t resemble a squirrel, a rat, a bird, or any other animal I’ve seen before. It’s a very peculiar-looking object. I suppose it could be something or nothing, like a piece of debris caught at an odd angle, a trick of the lighting, or something else that distorts its appearance. I’m not well-versed in photography, so all I can offer is my perception of how it appears to me.”
She clarified that the photo was taken with a 12 MP camera set to full auto mode and at full resolution, with no zoom utilized. The photo was taken on Cowley Hill Lane, St. Helens, between the Victoria Park entrance and the now-demolished health center. Mellisa mentioned her intention to send the photo to experts for their analysis.
Continuing, she relayed the insights of one researcher who noted that the figure appears two-dimensional and lacks detail, which echoed sentiments shared by others. The researcher explained that the photo is consistent with bright sun conditions and that she wouldn’t expect to see as much detail unless it was cloudy and dull. Additionally, she pondered the hypothetical scenario of the figure being an actual shape-shifting alien entity and questioned how it would be perceived by the human eye.
Mellisa emphasized that she did not notice the figure when she took the photo; it was merely a quick test shot to assess the camera’s functionality. She raised the valid point that if someone had placed the figure there as a prank, a model, a toy, or a cardboard cutout, why didn’t she or any passerby notice it